Comments on: Top 10 Reasons Why Website Frames Are Bad http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/ SEO Professional and Photographer Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:26:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kaiser http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3494 Kaiser Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:56:55 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3494 I rememeber when 6, 7 years ago frames were realy popular. It seemed that everyone was usung them. It made sence to use them to create just one page for navigation. Although I still see some high ranked websites using them. They just have to do a lot more work optimizing their website other ways. I rememeber when 6, 7 years ago frames were realy popular. It seemed that everyone was usung them. It made sence to use them to create just one page for navigation. Although I still see some high ranked websites using them. They just have to do a lot more work optimizing their website other ways.

]]> By: Jeevan http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3478 Jeevan Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:29:57 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3478 Framing should be avoided at all times unless it is really necessary. Framing these days are mostly used by theme sites to showcase their different style of themes. Framing should be avoided at all times unless it is really necessary. Framing these days are mostly used by theme sites to showcase their different style of themes.

]]> By: Quick HTML Question - Mac-Forums.com http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3377 Quick HTML Question - Mac-Forums.com Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:54:29 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3377 [...] of summarizing it here, I lead you to this and this page. Some of these issues may not be of concern to you such as search engine indexing (well, maybe [...] [...] of summarizing it here, I lead you to this and this page. Some of these issues may not be of concern to you such as search engine indexing (well, maybe [...]

]]> By: Zebu Blog » A Call for Responsible URL Shortening Services (RUSS) http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3309 Zebu Blog » A Call for Responsible URL Shortening Services (RUSS) Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:54:22 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-3309 [...] However, some services, most notably ow.ly and digg.com have taken a more extreme role. Instead of redirecting the URL, they keep the user on their domain and display the target website in a frame. One of the biggest problem with this approach is that, inserting the shortened link in my twitter message or other posts will not count to that website’s incoming link. Trackbacks, on your blog will not work with these links. Google’s crawler will not give credit to the target website, for this shortened URL as it technically does not point to that target web page. This is a serious limitation in a SEO conscious world. Secondly, they use up pricey real estate on your browser, for free, by placing a top bar with their own branding . Talk about being intrusive!? And finally do we want to be reminded yet again, against the usage of frames? [...] [...] However, some services, most notably ow.ly and digg.com have taken a more extreme role. Instead of redirecting the URL, they keep the user on their domain and display the target website in a frame. One of the biggest problem with this approach is that, inserting the shortened link in my twitter message or other posts will not count to that website’s incoming link. Trackbacks, on your blog will not work with these links. Google’s crawler will not give credit to the target website, for this shortened URL as it technically does not point to that target web page. This is a serious limitation in a SEO conscious world. Secondly, they use up pricey real estate on your browser, for free, by placing a top bar with their own branding . Talk about being intrusive!? And finally do we want to be reminded yet again, against the usage of frames? [...]

]]> By: reuben http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-230 reuben Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:33:31 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-230 apes: Users perhaps won't get a good experience (depending on how the frames are implemented) or be able to bookmark an internal page on your website, but it's not a security risk. Affiliates have been framing websites for years - one of the most common scenarios is when the website offers a plain or white label version of their website so the affiliate can put a frame at the top or side to brand it their own. apes: Users perhaps won’t get a good experience (depending on how the frames are implemented) or be able to bookmark an internal page on your website, but it’s not a security risk. Affiliates have been framing websites for years – one of the most common scenarios is when the website offers a plain or white label version of their website so the affiliate can put a frame at the top or side to brand it their own.

]]> By: apes http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-218 apes Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:01:37 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/top-10-reasons-why-website-frames-are-bad/#comment-218 Hi, Reuben...you know, I've had affiliates framing our site and I may not be the most technically savvy person around, but could this also be a breach of security? Thanks, Apes Hi, Reuben…you know, I’ve had affiliates framing our site and I may not be the most technically savvy person around, but could this also be a breach of security?

Thanks,
Apes

]]>