Comments on: My Thoughts On Google knol http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/ SEO Professional and Photographer Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:26:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: High Level Marketing http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/#comment-3159 High Level Marketing Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:33:54 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/#comment-3159 I agree. Wikipedia is unreliable. It is important to be able to be reliable information. Amanda <3 I agree. Wikipedia is unreliable. It is important to be able to be reliable information.

Amanda <3

]]> By: JP http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/#comment-1338 JP Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:15:45 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/#comment-1338 Isn’t Wikipedia unreliable enough? Now Google wants a new Wikipedia without even the little bit of editorial control that Wikipedia exerts?

Wikipedia, About, Answers, Google … the point of all of them is to help people find information. If any of them were doing a particularly good job of it, you wouldn’t see sites like findingDulcinea and Mahalo jumping in to fill that gaping hole.

What ever happened to real expertise and accountability? I want to know that the person giving me medical advice is a doctor who’s an expert in the field, not some 17-year-old hobbyist who gets a kick out of editing Wikipedia or writing Knols in his spare time.

]]> By: Gurpreet Singh Modi http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/#comment-1337 Gurpreet Singh Modi Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:21:03 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/my-thoughts-on-google-knol/#comment-1337 Google Knol appears to be a one big tool, aggregating the features of Wikipedia, Blogger and Yahoo Answers. <a href="http://gsmodi.blogspot.com/2007/12/googles-version-of-wikipedia.html" rel="nofollow">Related post on my blog</a> Google Knol appears to be a one big tool, aggregating the features of Wikipedia, Blogger and Yahoo Answers.

Related post on my blog

]]>