<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google TrustRank Myth Busted!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/</link>
	<description>SEO Professional and Photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:26:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: webandrank</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3391</link>
		<dc:creator>webandrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3391</guid>
		<description>Some people still confuse philosophy with algorithm,exist or not 1 plus one  is = two. So Reuben i agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people still confuse philosophy with algorithm,exist or not 1 plus one  is = two. So Reuben i agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laminating films</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>laminating films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>You really exposed Trusrank..i cam to your blog about searching for TrustRank,, but its speechless to know that fact that it does not exist..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really exposed Trusrank..i cam to your blog about searching for TrustRank,, but its speechless to know that fact that it does not exist..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3230</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3230</guid>
		<description>I love Matt Cutts. He is the one and only who talk about some secrets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Matt Cutts. He is the one and only who talk about some secrets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mituri SEO – TrustRank &#124; Tudi.ro</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Mituri SEO – TrustRank &#124; Tudi.ro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>[...] Au si inregistrat trademark-ul la momentul respectiv, pe care il puteti vedea pe site-ul lui Reuben Yau (fiind abandonat, se pare ca a fost scos din baza de date a US Patent &amp; Trademark Office-ului, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Au si inregistrat trademark-ul la momentul respectiv, pe care il puteti vedea pe site-ul lui Reuben Yau (fiind abandonat, se pare ca a fost scos din baza de date a US Patent &amp; Trademark Office-ului, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO INDIA</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO INDIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Trust rank does not exist.. Cool.. No doubt you are right that it is just not more that a copyright trademark. You really exposed Trusrank..i cam to your blog about searching for TrustRank,, but its speechless to know that fact that it does not exist..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust rank does not exist.. Cool.. No doubt you are right that it is just not more that a copyright trademark. You really exposed Trusrank..i cam to your blog about searching for TrustRank,, but its speechless to know that fact that it does not exist..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>There we go again, there is so much hype and myths out there that can easily distract one from doing the things that really matter to grow your site or blog.
At least thank you for the video, that is one myth that has been busted and hopefully will be send to where it belongs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There we go again, there is so much hype and myths out there that can easily distract one from doing the things that really matter to grow your site or blog.</p>
<p>At least thank you for the video, that is one myth that has been busted and hopefully will be send to where it belongs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reuben</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>reuben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>Google trademarked the name back in 2005</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google trademarked the name back in 2005</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yura</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator>Yura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3187</guid>
		<description>Okay, so what if Yahoo has patended the stuff. In the same pattern of naming algorithms, we can replace Page in Pagerank to get Trustrank, PigeonRank, RandomInsightRank, SocialRank, SpamRank, you name it.
Did Yahoo actually trademark the name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so what if Yahoo has patended the stuff. In the same pattern of naming algorithms, we can replace Page in Pagerank to get Trustrank, PigeonRank, RandomInsightRank, SocialRank, SpamRank, you name it.</p>
<p>Did Yahoo actually trademark the name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reuben</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3186</link>
		<dc:creator>reuben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3186</guid>
		<description>Yura
That&#039;s all I&#039;m trying to prove - this misnaming of the concept.
Whether or not Google can quantify trust from various signals and apply a formula to calculate it is not what I&#039;m questioning, it&#039;s just the false naming of the theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yura</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m trying to prove &#8211; this misnaming of the concept.</p>
<p>Whether or not Google can quantify trust from various signals and apply a formula to calculate it is not what I&#8217;m questioning, it&#8217;s just the false naming of the theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yura</title>
		<link>http://www.reubenyau.com/google-trustrank-myth-busted/#comment-3185</link>
		<dc:creator>Yura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reubenyau.com/?p=137#comment-3185</guid>
		<description>Regardless of how Google calls parts of its algorithm, do you mean to say that there are no filters/parameters that try to measure the authority of websites/pages on the Web?
So far, what you have proven is that we can&#039;t call it TrustRank. Okay, you are right, we shouldn&#039;t. But what about the algorithm? The sandbox effect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of how Google calls parts of its algorithm, do you mean to say that there are no filters/parameters that try to measure the authority of websites/pages on the Web?</p>
<p>So far, what you have proven is that we can&#8217;t call it TrustRank. Okay, you are right, we shouldn&#8217;t. But what about the algorithm? The sandbox effect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

