Comments on: Google Analytics Developers, Please Update urchin.js http://www.reubenyau.com/google-analytics-developers-please-update-urchinjs/ SEO Professional and Photographer Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:26:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tarmo888 http://www.reubenyau.com/google-analytics-developers-please-update-urchinjs/#comment-1202 tarmo888 Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:02:31 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/google-analytics-developers-please-update-urchinjs/#comment-1202 you don't need to modify urchin.js and host it on your server http://digg.com/programming/How_to_add_new_search_engines_to_Google_Analytics -- Hi Tarmo I should have gone back and edited this post, I actually now use push() to append variables to the end of the SE list. If you view source you'll see the new code. Thanks Reuben you don’t need to modify urchin.js and host it on your server
http://digg.com/programming/How_to_add_new_search_engines_to_Google_Analytics

–

Hi Tarmo

I should have gone back and edited this post, I actually now use push() to append variables to the end of the SE list. If you view source you’ll see the new code.

Thanks

Reuben

]]> By: Bill M http://www.reubenyau.com/google-analytics-developers-please-update-urchinjs/#comment-1117 Bill M Tue, 22 May 2007 15:38:15 +0000 http://www.reubenyau.com/google-analytics-developers-please-update-urchinjs/#comment-1117 I always thought that was AOL encrypting search terms for privacy. No? -- Hi Bill It's encoded if you use www.aol.com, but it's in plain view when using search.aol.com. Actually, I just tried a search and they've reverted back to using the query= variable. Here's two examples: <strong>www.aol.com</strong> http://search.aol.com/aol/search?encquery=be96de479e42554e197aece9a4974927&invocationType=aolcomsearch&ie=UTF-8 <strong>search.aol.com</strong> http://search.aol.com/aol/search?invocationType=topsearchbox.webhome&query=reuben+yau I guess they must have changed it again, sometime around the time when Google's Universal search was launched. Reuben I always thought that was AOL encrypting search terms for privacy. No?

–

Hi Bill

It’s encoded if you use http://www.aol.com, but it’s in plain view when using search.aol.com. Actually, I just tried a search and they’ve reverted back to using the query= variable. Here’s two examples:

http://www.aol.com
http://search.aol.com/aol/search?encquery=be96de479e42554e197aece9a4974927&invocationType=aolcomsearch&ie=UTF-8

search.aol.com
http://search.aol.com/aol/search?invocationType=topsearchbox.webhome&query=reuben+yau

I guess they must have changed it again, sometime around the time when Google’s Universal search was launched.

Reuben

]]>